BRC, FDA or EU? Match Food Certification to Your Market
BRCGS for UK/EU retail, FDA for the US, EU 1935/2004 for direct EU sale. They aren't interchangeable — here's which one your buyer actually needs.
PackTonne Sourcing Desk · · 6 min read
Food-contact packaging compliance differs by destination market, and matching the right documentation to your buyer’s actual requirement matters more than a single generic “food safe” claim. BRC (now BRCGS) is a packaging safety certification widely required across UK and EU retail supply chains. FDA governs US food-contact material requirements. EU 1935/2004 and EU 10/2011 form the EU’s own direct regulatory framework. They serve similar purposes but answer to different authorities, and documentation for one rarely satisfies another.

Certification and Regulation Comparison
| Scheme | Region | What it covers | Who typically requires it |
|---|---|---|---|
| BRC / BRCGS | UK, widely adopted across EU | Packaging site food safety management systems | UK/EU retailers across their supply chains |
| FDA | United States | Food-contact material safety requirements | US buyers and importers |
| EU 1935/2004 | European Union | Framework regulation — traceability, conformity declaration | Direct EU market sale |
| EU 10/2011 | European Union | Specific migration limits for plastic food-contact materials | Direct EU market sale, plastics specifically |
BRC (BRCGS): A Retail Supply Chain Requirement
BRC, now formally BRCGS (Brand Reputation through Compliance Global Standards), is a certification scheme covering a packaging manufacturer’s food safety management systems — process controls, hygiene, traceability — rather than certifying an individual product. It’s most relevant when your buyer is a UK or EU retailer that requires BRCGS certification across their entire supply chain as a condition of doing business, regardless of whether the packaging itself ever directly touches food (an FIBC liner does, the outer bag typically doesn’t). If your buyer hasn’t specifically asked for BRCGS, it may not be the relevant certification for your situation.
FDA: The US Market Requirement
FDA sets requirements for food-contact material safety in the US market, covered in more detail in our food grade bulk bags guide — the short version is that the FDA doesn’t certify packaging products directly but sets material and process requirements that a liner and production method need to meet, documented through compliance statements rather than a single certificate. This is the relevant standard for US-bound shipments specifically, not a universal requirement for every market.
EU 1935/2004 and EU 10/2011: The EU’s Own Framework
EU Regulation 1935/2004 is the framework regulation governing materials intended to come into contact with food across the EU, requiring traceability through the supply chain and a declaration of conformity confirming the material won’t transfer harmful substances into food beyond safe limits. EU 10/2011 adds specific migration limit rules for plastic food-contact materials — directly relevant to a PE liner’s compliance for EU-bound shipments. These are EU regulations, not certifications in the same sense as BRCGS — compliance is demonstrated through documentation and testing against specific migration limits, not a single certificate.
Why These Aren’t Interchangeable
Each of these addresses food safety and packaging compliance, but through different mechanisms and for different markets — BRCGS certifies a manufacturing site’s management systems, FDA sets US material requirements, and EU regulations set direct legal requirements for the EU market with their own testing and documentation standards. A supplier holding one doesn’t automatically hold or qualify for the others, and a buyer in one market generally won’t accept documentation designed for a different market’s specific framework as a substitute.
What to Ask Your Supplier For, By Market
If you’re selling into the UK or EU retail channel, ask specifically whether the manufacturing site holds current BRCGS certification. If you’re selling into the US, ask for documentation showing the liner material and production process meet FDA-relevant requirements. If you’re importing directly into the EU as the responsible party, ask for a declaration of conformity under EU 1935/2004 and migration test data under EU 10/2011 for the specific liner material used. Don’t accept a general “food safe” claim as a substitute for the specific documentation your actual market requires.
We work directly with partner factories in Shandong; ask us which specific certifications and regulatory documentation a given factory can support for your target market rather than assuming broad food safety credentials cover every requirement automatically.
Common Mistakes When Navigating Multiple Standards
- Assuming FDA compliance satisfies EU or BRCGS requirements. Each framework has its own scope and documentation — meeting one doesn’t automatically satisfy another.
- Treating BRCGS as a product certification rather than a site certification. It certifies the manufacturing site’s management systems, not a specific bag’s individual compliance.
- Not asking your buyer which specific standard they need. Guessing wastes time and can mean sourcing the wrong documentation entirely for your actual market.
- Assuming a supplier’s general “food grade” marketing claim covers a specific regulatory requirement. Push for the specific certification or regulation number relevant to your market.
- Overlooking that EU migration limits are material-specific. A liner material tested and compliant under EU 10/2011 for one formulation doesn’t automatically extend to a different liner material or thickness.
Multiple Markets Mean Multiple Documentation Sets
If you’re selling into more than one market — say, both US and EU customers — you likely need separate documentation for each, since FDA compliance and EU 1935/2004/10/2011 compliance are assessed independently even when the underlying liner material might reasonably meet both. Don’t assume one document set covers multiple markets; confirm what’s actually needed for each destination separately, and budget the time to gather multiple compliance packages if your customer base spans regions.
Decision Checklist
- What market is your buyer in — UK/EU retail, US, or direct EU import? This determines which specific standard actually applies.
- Has your buyer specified which certification or regulation they require? Ask directly rather than guessing.
- Are you confirming site-level certification (BRCGS) versus material-level compliance (FDA, EU regulations)? These are different types of documentation addressing different questions.
- Does your liner material have migration test data if you’re EU-bound? EU 10/2011 compliance depends on the specific material tested, not a general claim.
- Have you asked your supplier which documentation they can actually provide, rather than assuming? Confirm specifics before committing to an order for a specific market.
Final Thoughts
The simplest way through this is to ask your buyer which standard their own supply chain requires, then work backward. Guessing wastes weeks sourcing documentation nobody asked for, while missing the one that mattered. Tell us your destination market and what your customer has specified, and we’ll confirm which documentation applies to your order before production begins.
Before You Request a Quote
Tell us your target market and we’ll confirm what documentation applies:
- Destination market — UK/EU retail, US, direct EU import, or other
- Whether your buyer has specified a required certification or regulation
- Product type and liner requirements
- Target capacity and other spec requirements
Request a quote with your target market details and we’ll confirm the relevant certification pathway for your specific order.
Common Questions
What's the difference between BRC, FDA, and EU food contact requirements?
BRC (now BRCGS) is a packaging safety management certification widely required by UK and EU retailers across their supply chains. FDA sets US requirements for food-contact material safety. EU 1935/2004 and EU 10/2011 are the EU's own regulatory framework for food-contact materials sold directly into the EU market. They overlap in purpose but are administered separately and aren't automatically interchangeable.
Do I need BRC certification if I'm only selling to the US market?
Not typically — BRC/BRCGS certification is most relevant when your buyer is a UK or EU retailer requiring it as part of their supply chain standards. For US-only sales, FDA-relevant compliance is the more directly applicable requirement.
What does EU 1935/2004 actually require?
It's the EU's framework regulation for materials intended to contact food, requiring traceability through the supply chain and a declaration of conformity confirming the material won't transfer harmful substances into food at levels exceeding safe limits. EU 10/2011 adds specific migration limit rules for plastic food-contact materials.
Can one supplier provide documentation for all three — BRC, FDA, and EU?
Some suppliers pursue multiple certifications and regulatory documentation sets if they export to multiple markets, but this isn't automatic — confirm specifically which documentation a given supplier can provide rather than assuming broad food safety credentials cover every market's specific requirement.
Which certification should I ask for if I'm not sure which market my buyer needs?
Ask your buyer directly which standard or regulation their own supply chain requires — a UK/EU retailer will likely specify BRC, a US buyer will reference FDA, and direct EU importers may cite 1935/2004 or 10/2011 specifically. Matching to your buyer's actual requirement matters more than defaulting to one certification.
Who is legally responsible for food-contact compliance — me or my supplier?
Usually whoever places the packaging on the market in that jurisdiction, which is typically you as the importer. Your supplier provides the underlying material documentation; you carry the obligation to hold and produce it. Confirm this for your specific market rather than assuming the supplier absorbs the responsibility.
How current does a declaration of conformity need to be?
It needs to reflect the material and process actually used for your shipment. A declaration issued years ago against a since-changed liner formulation isn't valid evidence. Ask for documentation tied to the production run you're buying, not a general certificate held on file.
More in Standards & Compliance
All Standards & Compliance guides- Pharma-Grade FIBC: Why Food Grade Isn't Close EnoughCleanroom classification, a full GMP documentation chain and often two-way containment — pharma grade is a different category, not food grade with extras.
- FIBC Safety Labels: An Unreadable Tag Means Stop WorkA bag whose label you can't read is a bag with unknown specifications. Here's what has to be on it, and why a faded tag stops the job.
- GB/T 10454-2025: What Changed in China's FIBC StandardEffective March 2026, GB/T 10454-2025 replaces two older standards and is the first to formally separate single-trip from multi-trip requirements.
- ISO 21898 FIBC Testing: Six Tests, Not One Pass/FailISO 21898 is a suite — lift, drop, stacking, righting, tear and UV aging — each catching a failure mode the others miss. Here's what it checks.